Photos of Brooklyn Heights fron the NY Times, ”Living In Brooklyn Heights”.
Photo of a brick row house on the market for $2.95 million in Brookyn Heights.
Posted by Rowhouser at 12:27 PM. Filed under: Real Estate Markets •
Login • Register • Member List •
Photos of Brooklyn Heights fron the NY Times, ”Living In Brooklyn Heights”.
Photo of a brick row house on the market for $2.95 million in Brookyn Heights.
Posted by Rowhouser at 12:27 PM. Filed under: Real Estate Markets •
Article in New York Post, ”Duke 5th Ave. manse goes on block” shows $50 million row house on the market at the corner of 5th Avenue and 82nd Street in Manhattan.
Posted by Rowhouser at 01:37 PM. Filed under: Real Estate Markets •
Old NY Times Article: ”Brownstones; Sales Drop, Prices Rise” Published: August 30, 1987. Interesting to reflect on the following, “The average East Side price was $1,136,183; the West Side average was $619,048. The top East Side price, $6,992,227 was achieved by 4-6 East 75th Street. On the West Side, the top price was $4.2 million, for 37 West 70th Street.”
Posted by Rowhouser at 02:13 PM. Filed under: Real Estate Markets •
If you are trying to sell your house in the current real estate environment, then be prepared for buyer’s abuse, especially if you are trying to sell your house without using a realtor. I have been trying to sell my house in NYS by owner (FSBO) in combination with using a flat fee listing service. The flat fee listing service gets my property on the local multiple listing (mls) and requires me to pay a buyers/sellers commission. I selected to pay 2.5% to the agent that brings me a buyer, however I really have no one representing me and this can make the process a bit harrowing.
Since March 2008 three buyers have throw me the same low ball all cash offer of $450,000. In all cases I did not respond to these offers. I had two other offers which were higher than the three all cash offers but they came with qualifying statements attempting to let me know that the buyers are in the driver’s seat. One buyer made me an initial offer of $470,000 (not a bad first offer) however the offer came with the statement that he was making offers on three other houses simultaneously. I perceived this statement to mean his offer was not negotiable, so I pleasantly wished him good luck in his search for a home. I also received an offer of $465,000 which came with similar qualifying statements and I pleasantly declined without making a counteroffer.
Eventually I received a call from a real estate agent that had shown my house to her clients the previous day. She said her clients were interested in two houses in my area and that her clients were more interested in the other house than in my house. She requested that I make a lower offer than my asking price of $498,000. She indicated that she knew her clients offer but could not disclose it. So I requested that I get back to her the following morning, but she insisted that her clients needed to make a decision before 12 noon. So I reluctantly got off the phone to discuss it with my wife. My wife suggested that we drop the price to $490,000 but I decided unilaterally that I would drop the price to $480,000 in an attempt to conclude the transaction and move on with our lives. I presented the offer to the realtor and she said that she would write up the paperwork, leading me to believe that my offer was below her client’s undisclosed offer.
Five hours later I get a call from the buyer’s agent and she presents me with an all cash offer of $450,000 closing in two weeks. I was pissed, but I politely refused and hung up the phone. The following day she called me requesting that I further bid against myself and reduce my asking price. I again politely declined and several days later she presented me with a new offer of $470,000 with a 20% down payment.
Well the abuse just kept coming from these latest buyers. On several occasions we had come to a meeting of the minds on price and terms, yet they just kept changing their minds and continued to drag out the process in an attempt (what I perceive) to wear me down. Eventually after 5 weeks I dropped the price to $483,000 on the MLS and scheduled an open house for the weekend. These buyers became very upset over my actions and nearly threatened to pull out of the deal (by the way they still had not signed the contract and put up the deposit). This experience reminded me of an old relationship I had with a woman. This woman had several affairs with other men while I kept attempting to accommodate her and preserve the relationship. Finally I decide to act in my own best interests and she accused me of having ruined the relationship.
If you are about to sell your house be prepared for the rocks. There are a lot of buyers running around just throwing rocks in an attempt to beat you lower and lower and lower. At the same time you have to be realistic about the market. Don’t put your house on the market and price it too high. The fact that I am receiving offers is an indication that I am close to selling. You may need to give someone a good deal but you don’t want someone to steal your property from you and you certainly would like to transact without the hurling rocks.
Posted by Rowhouser at 05:16 PM. Filed under: Real Estate Markets •
New York Times article in the Sunday Times, ”Hoboken Weathers the Market”.
Posted by Rowhouser at 12:55 PM. Filed under: Real Estate Markets •
A reflection of the US dollar losing ground against other currencies.
Posted by Rowhouser at 09:34 PM. Filed under: Real Estate Markets •
Trump Soho hotel condominum at 246 Spring Street, New York, N.Y. 10013
Posted by Rowhouser at 07:01 PM. Filed under: Real Estate Markets •
Article in this Sunday’s real estate section of the NY Times ”Taking The Pulse Of The Boroughs” points out that ”Brooklyn hinges on buyers who can not afford to stay in Manhattan” and ”Brooklyn prices will remain high if Wall Street executives and foreign buyers continue to drive up Manhattan prices.”. These same assumptions could apply to Hoboken and Downtown Jersey City. Many newly arrived residents of Downtown Jersey City have moved here from Manhattan or from foreign countries. Though some recent residents have relocated from the New Jersey suburbs and other parts of the United States, most would have preferred to move to Manhattan had it been more affordable in the first place. The above two quotes were taken from page two, paragraph three of the above mentioned NY Times article.
Posted by Rowhouser at 01:20 PM. Filed under: Real Estate Markets •
If you are considering buying a home for the first time and plan to be in a home for a considerable period of time, then considering buying in the next 12 to 24 months. Why? There has been a convergence of market conditions that point to a buying opportunity. First, interest rates are at an all time low which means you can lock in that mortgage rate at historic lows. Second, the real estate market has turned into a buyer’s market with inventory levels rising. Third, the dollar is weak internationally and real estate prices over the long term are subject to the effects of inflation.
The US dollar has declined against the Eurodollar for the past five years. In the short term US housing values are more a function of local supply and demand, but over the long term other less apparent factors could eventually work their way into US housing values and costs. If you are an avid traveler of Europe, then you should have an appreciation of what I am talking about. If your dollar is worth half of what it was worth five or six years ago overseas, than what is your home really worth today. If you sell your home today for double what you paid for it ten years ago (in US dollars) and then take those dollars to Europe, how much appreciation in terms of “true value” did you obtain?
What affect will the weakening US dollar have on US housing prices? Will this put upward pressure on the US housing market over time? Consider the price of oil, gold, and other commodities including the cost of building materials for a home. If gold is $1000 an ounce and the dollar has depreciated by 50% against most major foreign currencies, then gold’s appreciation from $400 to $1000 an ounce is more a function of the depreciating dollar rather than a true increase in the price of gold.
This holds true for oil as well. If oil has risen from a price of $15 a barrel 10 years ago to a price of $105 a barrel today, then what amount of that dollar increase is a result of the depreciation of our own currency (the US dollar). Oil and gold are “international currencies” and many of the building materials we use in our homes are affected by long term changes in exchange rates. What does this mean for housing prices today and in the future and what does this mean for the cost of construction now and in the future?
Housing prices have more than doubled in most regions, but construction costs have risen as well. In many instances material costs have doubled and even tripled, so it may cost twice as much to build that house as compared to what it might have costs ten years ago. If the median and average selling price of a home continues to decline, then construction of new homes will fall dramatically. Why? Because rising construction costs and falling housing prices will squeeze builder’s gross profit margins forcing them to postpone many future projects.
The New York City real estate market is the most likely real estate market to be impacted by the falling dollar, because of its appeal to international investors. While real estate prices are failing in most local US real estate markets, New York City prices continue to rise. Why? Well demand is high and supply is low and the dollar is weak. Foreign investors are hungry for Manhattan real estate and much of the added supply of new construction is swallowed up by foreign investors.
Please note this article was written for information purposes only and should not be relied on to make material financial decisions. Speak to your lawyer, financial advisor and your tax specialist for professional advice in purchasing a home.
Posted by Rowhouser at 10:05 AM. Filed under: Real Estate Markets •
The price difference between various real estate markets is what many people try to profit from. This is called a price spread. For example, Manhattan residential real estate prices are roughly $1000 a square foot while Downtown Jersey City and other equivalent outlying urban areas of Manhattan might be $550 a square foot, a price spread of $450 ($1000 less $550) a square foot.
Bond traders or people that trade stocks look for price spreads. Bond traders refer to the spread in basis points and yield to maturity. So if a corporate bond yields 8% and an equivalent term US treasury bond yields 6%, then they would say that corporate bonds trade at a spread of 200 basis points or 2% (8% - 6%) to US treasuries.
With real estate markets people reach out to more far reaching markets in the hope that those markets may mature and/or improve and that prices may rise closing the spread between that market and another. Looking at Brooklyn Heights versus Downtown Jersey City there is a significant price spread. The selling price per square foot for housing in Brooklyn Heights is higher than in Downtown Jersey City. Recently I previewed several properties in Brooklyn Heights selling for about $850 a square. Since real estate in Downtown Jersey City is selling for about $550 per square foot, then this would imply a price spread per square foot of $300 ($850 - $550) between these two markets.
Infact depending on the property and its exact location within Brooklyn Heights, prices can far exceed $850 a square foot. On February 6, 2005 an article was published in the New York Times titled “$8.5 million Brownstone Deal Raises the Bar in Brooklyn” pointing out that the prices of row houses in Brooklyn Heights had reached all time new highs.
A lot of development is transpiring in Downtown Jersey City. This development will probably keep prices down in the near term (next couple of years) as a lot of inventory comes on the market and requires market absorption. However beyond the next couple of years as Downtown Jersey City improves, spreads should narrow.
As larger developers complete their projects and advertise them, more attention should be brought to bear on Downtown Jersey City. I speculate that Donald Trump has every intention of marketing his Trump Plaza Jersey City beyond the local markets. Plus let’s not forget about the new $130 million dollar international golf course near Liberty State Park (called the Liberty National Golf Club) and the $4.8 Billion Liberty Harbor North project. These projects should translate into positive marketing exposure for Downtown Jersey City and should result in some international exposure as well.
Posted by Rowhouser at 03:28 PM. Filed under: Real Estate Markets •
If you are considering buying a home you are probably wondering, “Should I buy now or wait?” This could be a difficult decision to make and may depend on many factors both economic and personal. This article focuses on the economic factors rather than the personal; however potential home buyers would be wise to take a holistic approach in their decision to buy a home. Here I am only interested in analyzing numeric information for the purpose of creating a hypothetical range for the optimum point of entry. By holistic I mean considering all the personal and financial ramifications specific to a buyer’s own circumstances, i.e. the needs of their family, their financial situation, and their personal tolerance for risk, as well as any other personal financial planning considerations. So where might be the optimum point of entry? I think most of us would agree that (assuming we were in the market to buy a home today) we would buy a property right now if we could buy it for what it would have sold for 10 years ago. So let me pose this question, “In most instances excluding some extraneous extraordinary circumstances, would you buy a property right now if you could buy it for the same price it would have sold for 10 years ago?”. If your answer to this question is “yes” than you would probably agree with the following statement, “The optimum point of entry in purchasing a property in the current real estate market would be between what it sold for 10 years ago and what it would have sold for at the peak of the market”. Let us create a numeric example. We have a home in a typical uneventful suburban real estate market that would have sold for $250,000 10 years ago and at the peak of the market would have sold for $500,000, an increase of 100.00%. Since the peak of the market the house has declined 10% in value and can currently be purchased for $450,000. Let us assume the following: 1) $500,000 (price at peak) to be the hypothetical ceiling price for the property and 2) $250,000 (price 10 years ago) to be the hypothetical floor price for the property. In an attempt to narrow the range let us consider the rise in the cost of construction over the last 10 years. Assume that the same house would have cost $150,000 to build 10 years ago and that the same house would cost $300,000 to build today. Let us further assume that the estimated land value 10 years ago would have been the market value of $250,000 less the cost to build at that time of $150,000. Hence the estimated land value 10 years ago would have been $100,000. Here is a summary of our example. |
Now |
10 Years Ago |
Increase (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $450,000 | $250,000 | 80.00% |
| Cost To Build | $300,000 | $150,000 | 100.00% |
| Land Value | $150,000 | $100,000 | 50.00% |
So let me pose the next question, "If you could buy a property for the cost to build today plus the estimated land value of 10 years ago, would you buy it?". I think most people would answer “yes” to this question, hence we have deduced a new hypothetical floor price of $400,000 (the $300,000 cost to build today plus the $100,000 estimated land value of 10 years ago.) Here is an updated summary of what we have deduced so far. |
Now |
||
|---|---|---|
| Price at Peak | $500,000 | |
| Today’s Price | $450,000 |
|
| Hypothetical Floor | $400,000 |
Now we are $50,000 below the high and $50,000 above our hypothetical floor price. Can we assume that the value of the property would never fall below our hypothetical floor price? The answer is “no”. In fact during the early 1990’s there where many instances where housing values dropped below their replacement cost (cost to build). However this may be the only way to evaluate resistance at that level. The cost to build a home does not create an absolute floor price for any home’s falling market value but hypothetically may create some resistance at that level over the long term. In addition you must consider the condition of the structure and the potential obsolescence of the home. A small ranch with small rooms may have no value at all in a neighborhood where larger homes are now being constructed. Now let us analyze interest rates and their potential effect on housing. Assume that 30 year fixed mortgage rates were 8.75% 10 years ago. Assume that 30 year fixed mortgage rates are now 5.75%. Assume that the annual real estate taxes of the property have increased from $5,000 10 years ago to $10,000 today. Assume that any buyer intending to acquire the property would place a down payment of 20% and borrow with a 30 year fixed mortgage. Here is a summary of our assumptions. |
Now |
10 Years Ago |
Increase (%) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $450,000 | $250,000 | 80.00% | |
| Cost To Build | $300,000 | $150,000 | 100.00% | |
| Land Value | $150,000 | $100,000 | 50.00% | |
| Down Payment | $90,000 | $50,000 | 80.00% | |
| Mortgage Amount | $360,000 | $200,000 | 80.00% | |
| Mortgage Rate | 5.75% | 8.75% | ||
| Extrapolating the above: | ||||
Now |
10 Years Ago |
Increase (%) |
||
| Mortgage Payment | $2,101 | $1,573 | 33.56% | |
| Monthly Taxes | $834 | $417 | 100.00% | |
| Total Monthly Payment | $2,935 | $1,990 | 47.49% | |
Declining mortgage rates create economic value for the buyer/borrower. In our example 30 year mortgage rates have declined 300 basis points. If 30 year mortgage rates rise from 5.75% back to 8.75%, the value of a $360,000 (5.75% fixed rate) loan issued today would fall from $360,000 to approximately $267,047 (using the NPV method). This translates into a gain/loss of $92,953 assuming the loan is held until maturity. Keep in mind that when you borrow to finance your home, you are the seller of the loan and the lender is the buyer. A fixed mortgage contains an embedded call feature (call option) allowing you the borrower to call the loan or pay it off early. Hence if mortgage rates fall you can call the loan and/or refinance it at a lower rate, and if mortgage rates rise you can hold the loan until maturity. Observe that the total monthly payment has increased by 47.49%. This is an interesting piece of information because it allows us to observe how much the proposed monthly payment has increased in relation to the price of the home after taking into effect the decline in 30 year mortgage rates and any increase in real estate taxes. As a buyer what do you do? Much of this decision making will depend on individual circumstances. A buyer that intends to live in the home for only a short period of time may be advised to wait out the current uncertainty in the market. A buyer that intends to live in the home for ten years or more may be inclined to lock up the current circumstances. It all depends on your personal tolerance for risk, your personal needs, and your ability to sustain losses. It would be difficult to time the bottom of the market, but at the same time no one could afford to buy a house today and sell it in a year if prices continue to fall. Please note this article was written for information purposes only and should not be relied on to make material financial decisions. Speak to your lawyer, financial advisor and your tax specialist for professional advice in purchasing a home. |
Posted by Rowhouser at 03:35 PM. Filed under: Real Estate Markets •
Foreclosures will hit outlying areas harder, such as Jersey City Heights, Bergen Lafayette and Journal Square. An article in this Sunday’s NYTimes, ”Beaten Down, and Not Only by Nature” highlights that almost 30% of houses on the market in Far Rockaway, Queens are being sold by banks.
Posted by Rowhouser at 06:10 PM. Filed under: Real Estate Markets •
We traveled to Bushwick Brooklyn in search of the ”cheaper apartment”. Rents in Hoboken and Downtown Jersey City have risen as much as 300% since 1996 making it unaffordable for many young struggling professionals and artists. There are a lot of lofts in Bushwick but not many rowhouses. Admittedly spending a single day in Bushwick is probably not enough time to fully appreciate this area of Brooklyn. We had coffee at Brooklyn’s Natural near the subway station. We were approached during the day by two individuals that were obviously under the influence of illegal substances. We stopped at an HVAC supply store where we needed to be buzzed in for security reasons. If you want to know more about Bushwick Brooklyn try Bushwickbk.com, a blog or journal about Bushwick. Here is an entry on Bushwickbk.com regarding crime in Bushwick.
Posted by Rowhouser at 12:12 AM. Filed under: Real Estate Markets •
Article on CNN Money.com points out flattening and falling rents throughout the country except in San Francisco and New York where massive demand more than offset increased supply. “These cities compete in a global market and by world standards they’re still relatively inexpensive for foreign currency-based consumers taking advantage of a weak dollar.”
Posted by Rowhouser at 10:14 PM. Filed under: Real Estate Markets •
Blog entry at UrbanDigs.com mentions Manhattan real estate market’s link to Wall Street and the financial sector, affodability and jobs and the potential for layoffs in the financial sector.
Posted by Rowhouser at 03:11 PM. Filed under: Real Estate Markets •
Urban living, real estate, restoration, renovation, investments, and raising children in an urban environment.....w/ an emphasis on the urban row house. Row houses are unique and are more in demand as the number of apartments versus the number of row houses increases.
Mortgage Calculators
Real Estate Calculators
Business Plans
Hoboken City Realty
Re/Max Gold Coast
Hudson Place Realty
Renaissance Realty Group
Corporate Realty Inc.
Chelsearealtors Inc.
Uptown Realty Inc.
Patina Realty
Hoboken Brownstone Company
Elite Brokers, LLC
Choice Properties
Armagno Agency
Petruzzelli Realty
Brian David Realtors
Singleton Galmann Realty
Caulfield Real Estate
Liberty Realty
Weichert Realtors
Robert DeRuggierio Inc Realtors
NJ Gold Coast Real Estate
Avalon Realty
Del Forno Real Estate
American Homes Realty
Coldwell Banker Realty
The Corcoran Group
Klara Madlin Real Estate
River 2 River Realty
Prudential Douglas Elliman
Sotheby's Int'l Realty - Upper West Side
Battery Park Realty
William B May Co Real Estate
Weichert Realtors Mazzeo Agency
Brown Harris Stevens
Manhattan Residential
Manhattan Living Realty
Christie’s Great Estates
HH Realty Group
Citi Habitats New York
City Sites
Marilyn Korn Real Estate
A-Ball Plumbing Supply
Abatron
Accurate Lock & Hardware
Adams Fireplace Shop
Chestnut Specialist Inc
Crownpoint Cabinetry
Vixen Hill Shutters
Mountain Lumber
Ludowici
Carlisle